Tentpole watch: 'Pacific Rim' teaser and 'Avatar' update

It's hard to think of tentpoles releasing a year or two years from now when a juicy franchise like The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey comes out just two Fridays from now. But today brings updates on two highly anticipated tentpoles: Pacific Rim and the Avatar sequels.

Guillermo del Toro, the original director of The Hobbit series before dropping out due to MGM's bankruptcy-related delays, turned his attention to Pacific Rim, an aliens vs. robots sci-fi movie that promises to show off del Toro's skills as a creature creator. Warner Bros. just released a viral teaser that reveals part of the plot in the form of a frantic news broadcast. The poor Golden Gate Bridge is cracked in half by an alien, who is then subdued and placed on a ship in the same manner as the T-Rex in The Lost World. When it comes to the blueprints of the robots, which were also released, I'm not quite as excited. They look like giant Iron Men or Transformers. There's not a lot of originality, at least in their form. How they perform in action may be a different story. The movie comes out next July.

 

 

The blue-hued, naturalistic aliens in Avatar will begin their CG creation late this year, according to an interview conducted with writer/director James Cameron in New Zealand, where he's hanging out and finishing up the script for the sequel. Apparently the script for Avatar wasn't finished at the time of production (normally a big no-no), leading to a lot of work for scenes that were later cut. A completed script for Avatar 2 plus working with creatures that have already been created in CG should mean the time from production to screen is shorter, though I wouldn't bet on that. Especially because Cameron imposed a new challenge for the series by setting it underwater, which should multiply the difficulty for both the CG team and the poor humans who have to spend a lot of time in water tanks. Though between Cameron's experience on The Abyss and Titanic, he's at home with the difficult filming conditions. Even with production starting late next year, it's unlikely the movie will release until 2015. By that time, the three-film series of The Hobbit will be done, and audiences will be more than eager to pick up where the 2009 Avatar left off.

2010 Best Director nominees--where are they now?

Usually, an Oscar nomination--and especially an Oscar win--launches the honorees into a career stratosphere. The actors are cast in the next big projects, and the directors can afford to be picky about their next films. Although I've seen most of the 2010 acting nominees in a couple of movies since, only one of the 2010 directing nominees has released a new film. However, most of them are working on new projects, and two of them have films coming out this year. Let's check in: Where are they now?

Kathryn Bigelow (winner, Best Directing Oscar for The Hurt Locker). Bigelow beat her ex, James Cameron, for the Oscar and became the first female to win the directing honor. The Academy just can't pass up on creating a good story, can it? Bigelow's actually the furthest along of the bunch. Her film, Zero Dark Thirty, has a release date, December 19, 2012, and a distributor, Columbia. The military actioner centers on the Navy SEALS who take down Osama Bin Laden.

James Cameron (nominee, Avatar). Cameron went deep-sea diving. He converted Titanic to 3D. However, what audiences want most--a sequel to Avatar--may not be coming anytime soon. He and producer Jon Landau also just pushed back the release date of Avatar 2 from December 2014 to sometime in the future after that. That means there will be at least a six-year lag between the first film and its sequel, a bummer for fans who want to explore more of Pandora. (Word is the second film will dive down to the planet's oceans).

Darren Aronofsky (nominee, Black Swan). Since the success of his dark ballerina thriller, Aronofsky has mulled over three different biopics. He's currently casting Noah, with Russell Crowe in the lead role, so it appears the Biblical epic will go first. He's also considered directing Get Happy, a Judy Garland biopic with Anne Hathaway attached to star. Now comes word that Paramount may acquire The General, an Unforgiven-style biopic of our nation's first president, George Washington. He's obviously trying to find the most perfect follow-up project, but I hope he gets moving. Whatever he does, it's guaranteed to be original.

Jason Reitman (nominee, Up in the Air). Reitman is the only one of the group who has directed an original feature since his nomination. Young Adult, which came courtesy of screenwriter Diablo Cody and star Charlize Theron, was fantastic (in my opinion), but it did so-so both at the box office and at the awards circuit. I applaud Reitman for churning out projects while maintaining his sensibility--he tends to mix dark comedy with poignant moments, and I like films like that. He just cast his child lead for his next project, Labor Day. The adaptation of a novel by Joyce Maynard centers on a single mom (Kate Winslet) who gives a convict (Josh Brolin) a ride, leading to a relationship. It's filming this summer, and it will probably be out before Aronofsky's film.

Lee Daniels (nominee, Precious). Daniels' next film is The Paperboy, which IMDB lists as having a November 21, 2012, release date, but no major distributor. However, the thriller may show up at the Cannes Film Festival, and everyone will find out if it packs the wallop of Precious. The story centers on a newspaper reporter who goes to Florida to try to free an inmate on death row. Things start getting complicated when his younger brother, who is also working on the case, develops a relationship with a woman who has been corresponding with the inmate. He also has The Butler in the works, the story of a black White House butler who served eight U.S. presidents.

Each of these directors has likely had their pick of projects. Will they all deliver?

 

James Cameron previews footatge of 3D 'Titanic'

By Sarah Sluis

"Are you ready to go back to Titanic?" In advance of the movie's spring re-release, director James Cameron and producer Jon Landau previewed eighteen minutes of 3D-converted footage in New York City today for journalists. Cameron is currently shepherding the film through a sixty-week, $18 million, 2D to 3D conversion process. Set to open April 7, 2012, the re-release will commemorate the hundred-year anniversary of Titanic's voyage and sinking (April 10th-14th, 2012). But what about the 3D? The answer may be that it's beside the point.

As the re-release of The Lion King in 3D has shown, audiences went to the theatres primarily to revisit a classic, beloved movie. The 3D was an afterthought, and a significant percentage of ticket-buyers opted for 2D. I think viewers will approach Titanic in 3D the same way. While I mostly enjoyed seeing the footage in 3D, what I most connected to was the movie itself. I had forgotten what an immersive, emotional experience the film was--and how much of a difference it makes to see it on the big screen. Cameron hopes the movie will be a success because of its "nostalgia component," people remembering who they saw it with at the time, "the relationships they were in," and otherwise connecting to where they were when the movie came out. He said that the teen girls who saw Titanic multiple times (that would include me and all the other girls in my 7th grade class) were in the minority, maybe "only $200 million" of the movie's $1.8 billion box office. If the movie played from "eight to eighty" the first time around, Titanic should have similar broad appeal in the re-release.

Cameron noted that increasingly, people are making choices about which movies they want to see in theatres and which ones they want to see on Netflix. It's a "contract with yourself" to see a movie in a theatre, because it means you're deciding that film deserves to be seen with your full attention and no multitasking. It's also a social experience. People saw Titanic twelve weeks in because they were making a point to see the movie with valued friends and family, and it "takes time" to coordinate schedules. I agree that Titanic played best in theatres. I myself bought the two-VHS box set but couldn't bring myself to rewatch the movie more than a few times. Each time I saw the future Oscar winner in theatres, once with a friend and a few weeks later with my Mom, the theatre was sold-out, packed with ooh-ing audiences. That kind of experience makes going to the theatre worthy.

Cameron, who has long been an advocate of 3D, also commented on the direction the medium has been taking. He was fine with Titanic queuing up behind a number of other re-releases. In early 2012, Disney tries its luck again with Beauty and the Beast 3D (Jan. 13) and George Lucas re-releases Star Wars Episode 1: The Phantom Menace (Feb. 10), all before Titanic's April re-release. Cameron's in favor of 3D re-releases of library titles--they're the "only reason" to choose conversion. He lambasted "Hollywood bean counters" who would opt for an $8 million conversion over the $10 million to shoot native 3D when the first would be only "half as good." He also gave a nod to director Martin Scorsese's upcoming 3D Hugo, citing it as an example of an "auteur" who sees 3D as just another color to paint with.

Will Titanic see the same success as The Lion King? I think the movie should do at least as well. We're talking about the #6 domestic movie of all time, using adjusted box office figures. The movie will be marketed with at least as much energy as a new release, according to Cameron and Landau. The campaign will also have to correct for the vagaries of people's memories. For example, he mentioned that a lot of people remember the movie as a sappy love story (I'll put myself in that category), but the marketing will remind people of how much was at stake: This is also a disaster movie in which people die terrible deaths, freezing and drowning in the icy waters. During the clips, I was reminded of just how suspenseful the original movie was. The scene where Rose frees Jack from his handcuffs as the icy waters rise, for example, had me on the edge of my seat. During other sequeneces, I had to hold back tears--from one-minute scenes! Cameron has heartstring-pulling down to a science.

The re-release of Titanic will definitely reignite nostalgia for the movie and introduce a whole new audience to the romance-disaster epic. Some of the effects may look dated, and Kate Winslet's black-undertoned dye job looks more 1990s than 1920s, but their performances show why they're still top actors today. If Lion King could do $80 million, it would be a tragedy if Titanic's re-release reaches port before earning at least $100 million.

'Avatar' trailer igniting fans

By Sarah Sluis

Fox released the trailer for Avatar this morning, and it's confirming that this movie will be the must-see event in the holiday movie season. Since 25 minutes of the film were released at Comic-Con, and 15 minutes

of footage will be previewed tomorrow to those who received their IMAX

tickets, awareness and twittered first impressions are already rising, a good four months before its release.

The trailer opens with a technically stunning image of a space station and plane (a more polished version of Star Wars), and then segues into a series of aerial shots over the Na'vi planet, covered in acacia trees. Then we see Sam Worthington, who plays a paralyzed ex-Marine, rolling out of a ship in a wheelchair. In a laboratory, he sees his animated avatar floating in liquid before undergoing a process by which he inhabits the form. The rest of the trailer is a build-up montage of battles and hints of Worthington's relationship with a Na'vi woman (Zoe Saldana). Cameron claims to have had the idea for over fourteen years, but held back from making the movie until he could create a believable alien that audiences could identify with. The blue aliens in the trailer are tinged with the patina of CGI, but those who have seen the 3D images at Comic-Con, on a big screen say they look more realistic in a theatrical setting.

Cribbing from an Internet-supplied plot synopsis (potential spoilers included), the story of Avatar is strikingly similar to that of Pocahontas: a man befriends the natives (or, in this case, becomes one), and is won over to their viewpoint as he also becomes romantically involved with one of them. When the two sides enter into a conflict, he's forced to make a decision.

The story of a mole who changes his sympathies is a familiar one, and can be found in every genre, from spy movies to romantic comedies. There's a reason it sticks around: beneath a superficial premise there's an opportunity to make deep, thought-provoking commentary on the groups involved. Sci-fi movie District 9, which opened last week, also involves a human who becomes alien, and in the process starts to advocate for the "others."

James Cameron is working off an incredibly strong template, and this focus on story and action should broaden the appeal of Avatar to a wide range of viewers. Fox is marketing the movie with the tagline "by the director of Titanic," which

alludes not only to his most successful film, but also its

similarity to the new one. After all, Titanic, is as much an action film as a historical romance, just as Avatar seems to be not just a sci-fi action film, but a story about the perils of technology and colonialism.

IMAX showing a 16-minute first-look at 'Avatar'

By Sarah Sluis

In an unusual but not unprecedented move, a 16-minute sizzle reel of Avatar footage will be shown in over 100 IMAX theatres next Friday, August 21. A similar, slightly longer reel was recently shown at Comic-Con in San Diego. While originally 20th Century Fox's plan was "Show up, and we'll show you the clips," they have wised up to the potential crowds, and opted for an Internet-based clicking contest. Tickets will be given away at 3pm EST Monday, August 17th to the fastest clickers.

Why would a studio give away so much footage? From one perspective, it clearly shows they're confident about Avatar. I also suspect that this is a move to combat studio fears about having a big-budget movie that's not based on a "pre-sold" title. There was no Avatar comic book, best-selling novel, historical event, or television show. The idea is unproven, and people often don't want to risk the unfamiliar. Teased with sixteen minutes of Avatar, people will start talking more about the premise. Maybe part of the surprise will fade, but more people will be interested in seeing the film. It's a double-edged sword. I love the buzz and anticipation that comes before seeing a much-hyped movie, but when it fails to deliver, I'm more disappointed at seeing a "good" movie that was supposed to have been "great." Going into a film assuming it will be horrible, or a straight-up genre picture, can often make you appreciate the ways it has gone above and beyond your minimal expectations. While I hope to catch a glimpse of some Avatar footage before its release, for me, the pre-sold aspect of this movie is writer/director/producer James Cameron. I loved Terminator, Aliens and Titanic. Cameron's movies have connected with fans, who see them again and again, and most people in America have seen these films, no small feat. That he was able to achieve success with both a historic romance/disaster and sci-fi action films makes me respect him even more. 20th Century Fox will release the film during the winter movie season, December 18, 2009, so hopes are high that Cameron can deliver an unforgettable film that will become part of our cultural shorthand.